
Dext
Receipt and invoice capture for bookkeepers and firms.
Overview
On a typical morning, your team opens an inbox full of supplier PDFs, a stack of photographed receipts from clients, and a browser tab open to a utility portal. Dext captures all of those, pulls the structured data out of receipts, invoices, and bank statements, and posts the transactions into QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, or Excel. Clients photograph receipts on their phone, a browser extension picks up bills from supplier portals, and a dedicated email address catches PDF invoices as they arrive. Categorisation rules build up from prior postings, so regular suppliers need less correction over time.
Dext works with QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, and Excel. The Lite tier costs $25 per user per month and covers up to 200 receipts a month. The Business tier at $50 removes the receipt cap and adds multi-firm access, client dashboards, and line-item extraction from invoices. A free trial is available; there is no permanent free tier.
In daily use, Dext saves the most time on clients with high supplier-invoice volumes and varied receipt formats. Categorisation rules learn from previous postings, so repeat suppliers need less correction over time. For clients with fewer than about 50 documents a month, the Hubdoc capture that comes free with most Xero plans may be sufficient.
Compared to AutoEntry, which charges per credit rather than per user, Dext's per-user pricing works out cheaper for firms running many clients through one login. Dext also adds categorisation suggestions and supplier-feed connections that pull bills from utility and telco portals, while AutoEntry focuses on extraction only.
The service runs in the cloud with a mobile app and is available in the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and other regions. It fits solo bookkeepers through to mid-sized practices with up to around fifty staff.
See it in action


Product images courtesy of Dext.
Key facts
- Starting price
- $25 per month
- Pricing model
- Per user
- Free trial
- Yes
- Free tier
- No
- Deployment
- Cloud, Mobile
- Geography
- US, UK, AU, CA, Global
- Founded
- 2010
- Support
- Phone, Chat, Email, Knowledge Base
- Languages
- English, French
- Works with
- Quickbooks, Xero, Sage, Excel
- Last verified
- 2026-05-04
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Solo bookkeepers and small to mid firms that need receipt and invoice capture into QuickBooks, Xero, or Sage.
- Practices that want browser-extension and email-forwarding capture alongside a mobile app.
- Firms with multi-firm portfolios that need line-item invoice extraction (Business tier).
Cons
- Firms with very low capture volume. Manual entry costs less than the $25 per-user monthly fee.
- Practices on NetSuite or enterprise ERPs. Dext targets QuickBooks, Xero, and Sage.
- Firms that want a permanent free tier. Dext offers only a time-limited trial.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Billing | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | $25 | Per user per month | Up to 200 receipts a month, core capture features. |
| Business | $50 | Per user per month | Unlimited receipts, multi-firm access, line-item invoice extraction. |
Frequently asked questions
What does Dext do that Hubdoc doesn't?
How much does Dext cost?
Is Dext worth paying for if my clients already have Hubdoc free with Xero?
Does Dext work in the US?
How accurate is Dext's AI extraction?
Featured in
- 12 Best AI Tools for Accountants in 2026guide · 12 min read
- Best AI Tools for Small US Accounting Firms in 2026guide · 10 min read
- How to Narrow Down AI Accounting Toolsframework · 10 min read
- What AI Can and Cannot Do in Your Accounting Practice Todayframework · 10 min read
- AI Bookkeeping Tools Compared: What Actually Saves Time?comparison · 10 min read
- How to Evaluate AI Accounting Software: A 5-Point Frameworkframework · 10 min read
- Dext vs Karbon: Which AI Features Matter?comparison · 9 min read
User reviews
See what other accounting professionals say about Dext on independent review platforms.
Alternatives to Dext
Other AI tools in the Document capture and extraction category.
Last verified 2026-05-04. Pricing and features come from vendor-published specs. See our methodology.